Figure of Merit (FOM): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It is calculated by the formula <math display="block">\mathrm{FOM} = \mathrm{Res.} \cdot \mathrm{SNR}</math> where <math display="inline">\mathrm{Res.}</math> is the [[resolution]] (in lp/mm) and <math>\mathrm{SNR}</math> is the [[Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)|signal-to-noise-ratio]]. | It is calculated by the formula <math display="block">\mathrm{FOM} = \mathrm{Res.} \cdot \mathrm{SNR}</math> where <math display="inline">\mathrm{Res.}</math> is the [[resolution]] (in lp/mm) and <math>\mathrm{SNR}</math> is the [[Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)|signal-to-noise-ratio]]. | ||
== Considerations == | |||
Due to the resolution being usually around 2-3x higher than the SNR it has a larger impact on the value, although some consider SNR the more important factor of the two. | |||
The FOM is not to be taken as a tell-all-end-all as a full spec sheet gives far more detailed insight as to a tubes performance albeit it might seem slightly more esoteric to people who are unfamiliar with interpreting a spec-sheet. | |||
In order to fairly judge a tubes FOM rating one should have some knowledge of the category to which a tube belongs as well as an average or minimum number for at least one of the factors involved in producing a FOM rating. If one knows that a particular category of tubes has a minimum SNR of 30 with average at 36 then going by FOM alone when considering an individual tube of that category is less arbitrary. | In order to fairly judge a tubes FOM rating one should have some knowledge of the category to which a tube belongs as well as an average or minimum number for at least one of the factors involved in producing a FOM rating. If one knows that a particular category of tubes has a minimum SNR of 30 with average at 36 then going by FOM alone when considering an individual tube of that category is less arbitrary. | ||
=== Downsides === | |||
* The same FOM can be produced by a low SNR and high resolution and vice versa | |||
* Other important specifications like [[gain]], [[sensitivity]], [[halo]], [[Modulation Transfer Function (MTF)|MTF]], ... are not taken into account | |||
[[Category:Technology]] | [[Category:Technology]] |
Revision as of 14:04, 27 March 2023
Figure of Merit (FOM) is a dimensionless value that has been introduced as an arbitrary reference and shorthand overall performance grade of an image intensifier.
It is calculated by the formula
Considerations
Due to the resolution being usually around 2-3x higher than the SNR it has a larger impact on the value, although some consider SNR the more important factor of the two.
The FOM is not to be taken as a tell-all-end-all as a full spec sheet gives far more detailed insight as to a tubes performance albeit it might seem slightly more esoteric to people who are unfamiliar with interpreting a spec-sheet.
In order to fairly judge a tubes FOM rating one should have some knowledge of the category to which a tube belongs as well as an average or minimum number for at least one of the factors involved in producing a FOM rating. If one knows that a particular category of tubes has a minimum SNR of 30 with average at 36 then going by FOM alone when considering an individual tube of that category is less arbitrary.
Downsides
- The same FOM can be produced by a low SNR and high resolution and vice versa
- Other important specifications like gain, sensitivity, halo, MTF, ... are not taken into account