Figure of Merit (FOM): Difference between revisions
(Moved category) Tags: Reverted Visual edit |
Tag: Rollback |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* The same FOM can be produced by a low SNR and high resolution and vice versa | * The same FOM can be produced by a low SNR and high resolution and vice versa | ||
* Other important specifications like [[gain]], [[sensitivity]], [[halo]], [[Modulation Transfer Function (MTF)|MTF]], ... are not taken into account | * Other important specifications like [[gain]], [[sensitivity]], [[halo]], [[Modulation Transfer Function (MTF)|MTF]], ... are not taken into account | ||
[[Category: | |||
[[Category:Technology]] |
Latest revision as of 08:27, 25 April 2024
Figure of Merit (FOM) is a dimensionless value that has been introduced as an arbitrary reference and shorthand overall performance grade of an image intensifier.
It is calculated by the formula
Considerations[edit | edit source]
Due to the resolution being usually around 2-3x higher than the SNR it has a larger impact on the value, although some consider SNR the more important factor of the two.
The FOM is not to be taken as a tell-all-end-all as a full spec sheet gives far more detailed insight as to a tubes performance albeit it might seem slightly more esoteric to people who are unfamiliar with interpreting a spec-sheet.
In order to fairly judge a tubes FOM rating one should have some knowledge of the category to which a tube belongs as well as an average or minimum number for at least one of the factors involved in producing a FOM rating. If one knows that a particular category of tubes has a minimum SNR of 30 with average at 36 then going by FOM alone when considering an individual tube of that category is less arbitrary.
Downsides[edit | edit source]
- The same FOM can be produced by a low SNR and high resolution and vice versa
- Other important specifications like gain, sensitivity, halo, MTF, ... are not taken into account